Dark Doc or Homeless vs Nominee

Sorry if it is already discussed here, but I want to be straight about this topic.

I don't see any advantage to have a nominee.
If you want to be anonymous you should go on dark docs or homeless docs WITHOUT nominee. Because there is no sense to have nominee here. Am I right?

Another question (sorry) is the homeless must have passport or is it possible use National ID?
Because guys I live in Paraguay, here is territorial tax. I can arrange national homeless ID for everybody but if the case is only passport would be very hard, Paraguayans dont have passport. At least the poor ones, who would do it for money

I read all threads of this group and I got one conclusion: you don't need a dark offshore.

If you want to make it dark, you use dark documents of your own country, at banks and merchants from the same country.

It will be the same. You will be doing illegally, you will be anonymous and you dont need to pay tax neither. Then change it for crypto and be free.

Same business, same benefits, but cheaper and less complexity

Martin Everson said:

What happens if homeless person has some brains and goes to local bank to drain your account...lol. I assume they would have gone to bank with you for opening in Paraguay in first place unless you do it all remotely.

Actually not, we have EMI acc here as well.
So you just need a homeless to take some photo and open here, rotational private proxy and crypto. That's it.

there is no need to setup offshore in this case, actually I am thinking that offshore setup in almost all cases are being unnecessary. Correct if am I wrong

Offshore as tax or anonimity is gone, we only have public privacy and assets protection with an offshore company

CaptK said:

Using a homeless guy is the same as nominee. Using a professional service can work well. For example if you open a Mauritius company then you will be required to use a nominee, much the same as BVI, Cayman, Cyprus and Malta.

You can protect yourself from loosing your money if you are straight. If there is some angle where you entertain the idea of darks then you know what your doing. So pick your poison darks, homeless or nominee.

Using professional nominees you are not anonymous. You only have privacy.
Because professional ones they have your own data, if something go bad, they will appoint you.

so you risking to be scammed by one, spending money with it, and you just have public privacy? What is the real benefit?

homeless makes more sense, but it dont need to be offshore stuff as I said. Only waste of money and mind-break

Martin Everson said:

Are people saying its far better to do something like use a homeless guy than to do proper offshore planning? If so I am speechless.....and well good luck with that route I guess.

Which planning? There is no such structure to be anonymous. You should go to a territorial tax country and then makes sense open an offshore. For all posts that I read this is my conclusion.

if you wanna go dark why have to be offshore solution?