But your point 4 âhonest managementâ should be discarded. You should want a management that is smart, ambitious, well paid, with skin in the game and with enough power to be able to take decisions without having to pass through 5437356 layers of control.
Honesty and ethics are concepts that pertain to the local church, not to corporations.
No integrity? I'm OUT!
Not looking to do a Luigi on them...because that's what they deserve!
How can you possibly evaluate the integrity or other moral values of an executive?
Treat them as strippers/escorts and everybody will be happy. Problems arise when you start treating a stripper like a wife.
How can you possibly evaluate the integrity or other moral values of an executive?
Treat them as strippers/escorts and everybody will be happy. Problems arise when you start treating a stripper like a wife.
Their ARE red flags! I use Warren and Charlie as my "standard"
Problems arise when you start treating a stripper like a wife.
When I was fighting my war, my ex-wife and my GF at the time did NOT deposit ANY money into my commissary account.đ
Most strippers/escorts and porn stars I had hired during years did....some deposited money into my account every month and wrote letters weekly. I sh1t you not. That "wife" fairy tale is just that...a fairy tale so the STATE can get into the middle of two people for their CUT! đ€Ł đ€Ł đ€Ł đ€Ł
I prefer the stripper/escort WITH integrity vs the wife/relative with NO integrity! Of course, everyone else is entitled to their choices. đ€Ł
Data engineering is big now (and will be in the coming years).
What their software does:
Lets say you have the full database of OCT, you connect the database to Microstrategy, and create dashboards based on the data, query it with natural language.
Data engineering is big now (and will be in the coming years).
What their software does:
Lets say you have the full database of OCT, you connect the database to Microstrategy, and create dashboards based on the data, query it with natural language.
Data engineering is big now (and will be in the coming years).
What their software does:
Lets say you have the full database of OCT, you connect the database to Microstrategy, and create dashboards based on the data, query it with natural language.
The software really isnât the main point with them anymore, though.
So why they donât update their documents or start a separate spinoff?
probably practical and economical reasons
* cost of starting another publicly traded company?
* they started buying bitcoin when the original business was the only one and then it evolved
Saylor talked about the evolution hundreds of times... it's totally irrelevant now
as somebody who inherently refuses to believe audits and financial reports of SEC regulated publicly traded companies you're pretty pedantic today :D
probably practical and economical reasons
* cost of starting another publicly traded company?
* they started buying bitcoin when the original business was the only one and then it evolved
I would say: freedom to do whatever they want with their finances, without being subjected to the strict investment fund rules, including surprise audits of the investment strategy.
Thatâs exactly why this company is toxic: he sells 32 btc and the market panics.
another connected juicy story...
what if... the sale had another good reason? ;)
the question is now squared as there is an ongoing dispute regarding the market settlement based on the fact that Strategy sold in May but reported it in Jun :D
words mean nothing - proof of work/energy does - whoever is right here can make a shit tone of money - MSTR is an ideal target to short, the best way to exploit and punish somebody who
words mean nothing - proof of work/energy does - whoever is right here can make a shit tone of money - MSTR is an ideal target to short, the best way to exploit and punish somebody who
:)
Totally agree. MSTR is just another company with a shitty product and a creative CFO, it has nothing to do with Bitcoin. It could have created the same âstrategyâ with literally any other thing: diamonds, bees, freshwaterâŠ
MSTR is just another company with a shitty product and a creative CFO, it has nothing to do with Bitcoin. It could have created the same âstrategyâ with literally any other thing: diamonds, bees, freshwaterâŠ
we won't agree on that (at least not now) - the difference is that bees, freshwater or diamonds won't appreciate against USD (well, actually they will but two orders of magnitude slower than BTC) - they are tapping the right cask I think
shorting BTC is very unwise, shorting something like MSTR is poking a rattle snake
I don't know, I don't care, I don't advocate for anything but my current bet would be Strategy is the next Berkshire Hathaway (or whatever the normie financial world considers to be a gauge of success)
I am young and healthy enough to see how this plays out hopefully - let's lean back and get the popcorn ready
I don't know, I don't care, I don't advocate for anything but my current bet would be Strategy is the next Berkshire Hathaway (or whatever the normie financial world considers to be a gauge of success)
come on:
MSTR is run by a questionable guy who is extremely good at talking nonsense in a way that sounds smart to people who want to believe it to be smart.
It has a $47B market cap, holds BTC, and does whatever financial engineering behind the curtains.
Berkshire is worth over $1T and has a simple, understandable business model: it owns stakes in a long list of strong cash generating companies.
You can't even remotely compare the two.
Berkshire is worth over $1T and has a simple, understandable business model: it owns stakes in a long list of strong cash generating companies.
this strategy (based on big guys having priority access to cheap money made out of thin air) that worked last 20 years (or longer) won't hold in the next 20 years - the game has changed
I'm not afraid of being wrong, just saying what I can see now, time will tell
this strategy (based on big guys having priority access to cheap money made out of thin air) that worked last 20 years (or longer) won't hold in the next 20 years - the game has changed
This is a different story. Berkshireâs business (leaving aside the insurance etc) is value investing, it will always work.
I'm not afraid of being wrong, just saying what I can see now, time will tell
What we are seeing is a small company very hungry for fresh fiat money, and its boss becoming rich with shareholdersâ money in return for telling stories. All this has absolutely nothing to do with btc.
If you want to generate some income on your btc holdings, write calls. Like $BITA does.
But you need to know what you are doing. Otherwise (that is, for 99.9% of the investors), just HODL.
