made a post about it before and i got my issue solved out.
Just out of interest:
Someone recommened me a Stiftung/Foundation, because these wouldn't have a UBO.
It might be legally correct, but how are the banks seeing it?
Besides several countries -with their pros/cons- not doing the AEOI,
how do you see the USA as "Non-AEOI" with their intergovernmental agreements?
So far I have no idea how all of this works but I'm doing lot's of research since the medias around are full of information that this is the new tax have in the USA!!
without looking at the City of Reno yet, is it "just another" choice of offshore jurisdiction or can it be usefull in not reporting the UBO of a bank account? Will the US report?
Does this foundation structure really work with banks to avoid reporting a UBO?
Well I would like to learn more about Reno and even to find a CPA or company formation agent that know something about this!! so far I'm struggling to find anyone that is able to get me clear answers!
Well I would like to learn more about Reno and even to find a CPA or company formation agent that know something about this!! so far I'm struggling to find anyone that is able to get me clear answers!
Open a thread in the public forum and see if some CPA or service provider will respond!
If the foundation is the shareholder of a company, how do banks see it?
Do they consider the foundation with the purpose as UBO or the founder of the foundation, person who has authorized signature?
